The Biden administration’s selection of over 110,000 H-1B visa applications is set to impact employment opportunities for U.S. college graduates, amidst concerns about job displacement and fraud in visa programs.
By yourNEWS Media Newsroom
President Joe Biden’s administration is facilitating the entry of approximately 110,000 H-1B visa holders into the United States, targeting jobs typically sought by American college graduates, many of whom are already struggling with debt and job market pressures. The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), led by Alejandro Mayorkas, has selected 120,603 applications from companies, universities, and research centers to sponsor these workers.
USCIS emphasizes that the H-1B program is vital for addressing the needs of the U.S. labor market. However, this has raised concerns among domestic graduates about increased competition and limited job availability. Critics argue that the expansion of visa programs under Mayorkas’ leadership—including J-1, TN, O-1, and others—creates pathways that primarily benefit foreign graduates at the expense of U.S. workers.
According to USCIS statements, these measures are meant to attract STEM talent to strengthen the U.S. economy and competitiveness. Yet, this stance is controversial as nearly half of the 780,000 H-1B applications in 2024 were flagged for potential fraud, indicating systemic issues within the program.
Kevin Lynn, founder of the U.S. Tech Workers group, highlights the broader implications for American workers, particularly those in white-collar professions. He criticizes the administration for overlooking the adverse effects of high levels of immigration on American graduates who face significant peer pressure and underemployment. For instance, the Burning Glass Institute report notes that a substantial number of college graduates remain underemployed long after graduation, often in roles that do not require a degree.
Amid these challenges, the administration’s policies also cater to the demands of investors and businesses favoring a flexible, often lower-wage workforce, which can undermine wage growth and job security for U.S. citizens. Critics like Lynn argue that this approach not only displaces American workers but also stifles innovation by sidelining experienced professionals capable of driving technological advancements.
The situation reflects broader immigration policy debates and the balancing act between fostering economic growth through skilled immigration and protecting the interests and livelihoods of American workers. As these policies unfold, the impact on the domestic workforce, particularly recent college graduates, continues to stir significant discussion and policy scrutiny.
Similar migration policies have damaged citizens and economics in Canada and the United Kingdom.
The colonialism-like policy has damaged small countries and has killed hundreds of Americans and thousands of migrants, including many on the taxpayer-funded jungle trail through the Darien Gap in Panama.
