Ohio to keep ballot-box limits for now after judge calls them ‘unreasonable’
By Andy Sullivan
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Ohio’s top election official declined to loosen restrictions on absentee-ballot drop boxes on Tuesday after a state judge ruled they were “arbitrary and unreasonable” and said local officials should be able to install more if they wish.
The ruling initially appeared to be a victory for Democrats who have pressed for more drop boxes to accommodate voters who don’t want to return absentee ballots by mail in the Nov. 3 presidential election.
But Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose, a Republican, will not change rules that only allow one drop box for each of the state’s 88 counties, spokeswoman Maggie Sheehan said.
“Today’s ruling didn’t change anything, and the secretary’s directive remains in place,” she said.
Drop boxes have become a partisan flash point in the presidential election. Democrats have promoted them as a reasonable and reliable option for voters unnerved by the COVID-19 pandemic and U.S. Postal Service delivery problems.
Republican officials and President Donald Trump’s campaign have sought to limit them in many states, arguing without evidence that the receptacles could enable voting fraud.
In Ohio, LaRose’s restrictions leave the 864,000 registered voters of Cuyahoga County, a Democratic stronghold, with the same number of drop boxes as the 8,400 registered voters of Republican-leaning Vinton County.
Opinion polls show Trump holding a narrow lead over Democratic rival Joe Biden in Ohio.
Ohio Judge Richard Frye ruled that local authorities can set up more drop boxes. “Wholly arbitrary rules are entitled to no deference,” he wrote.
Democrats said that should allow local officials to set up more drop boxes if they wish.
But the judge’s decision did not strike down the rule outright, and Sheehan indicated LaRose may appeal. “Ohioans are fortunate that the judicial branch offers the opportunity to appeal a single trial judge’s opinion,” she said.
Ohio Representative Paula Hicks-Hudson, a Democrat, said LaRose had told her he would follow any court ruling, rather than pursue an appeal. “I’m calling on the secretary of state to keep his word,” she said on a conference call.
Democrats and Republicans have waged a state-by-state battle over absentee voting procedures ahead of the election, which could see up to half of all ballots sent through the mail.
In Pennsylvania, the state’s top election official said on Monday that local officials can’t discard returned mail ballots if the signature does not resemble one kept on file.
In Arizona, a federal judge ruled last week that state officials must give voters a chance to fix ballots that are returned without a signature, rather than rejecting them outright.
(Reporting by Andy Sullivan; Editing by Scott Malone, Dan Grebler and Jonathan Oatis)
More Top Stories
Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron will announce on Wednesday afternoon the decision over whether to bring charges against police officers in the deadly shooting of …read more
The U.S. Justice Department will unveil later on Wednesday a proposal that seeks to limit legal protections for internet platforms on managing content, a person …read more
The United States begins three days of tributes to Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Wednesday, when members of the public will get the …read more
U.S. President Donald Trump on Wednesday said he thinks the 2020 election will end up at the U.S. Supreme Court, adding that he thinks that …read more
U.S. stock index futures rose on Wednesday ahead of data that would throw light on the pace of an economic recovery from a coronavirus-driven recession, …read more
U.S. election day exercises simulating attacks ranging from hackers to anthrax to disrupt voting show state and local officials will struggle to quickly counter falsehoods …read more