VOSD Podcast: Chris Cate on Public Records, SDSU West and the State of the GOP
City Councilman Chris Cate told us on the podcast this week, “This was something … nobody knew about. We were not briefed, told, informed about this whatsoever. So without you all and what you guys do, we would of had no idea this was happening.”
Meanwhile, Cate gave us his take on the City Council’s decision to block Mayor Kevin Faulconer’s attempt to hire professional real estate consultants to help the city negotiate with SDSU for the sale of the former Chargers stadium property in Mission Valley.
Councilwoman Barbara Bry said there was no need for the $500,000, one-year contract because the major deal points were already resolved and getting it done should be straightforward. Not so, Cate said.
“If you look at who’s on the other side of the table, from SDSU, they have attorneys and real estate experts who are going to be at the negotiation table against us,” he said. “And I love our city staff … I would say that they have some expertise in this, but they also do other things. They’re running a city and involved in a million other things. Their attention isn’t dedicated strictly to this.”
He said the deal would be straightforward if all they had to do was conduct an appraisal and transfer the land for that much money, but he expects that price to be whittled down based on deductions from the cost of renovations and investments SDSU will need to make once they take over.
The interview with Cate starts at minute 23.
The State of Homelessness in East Village
It’s been more than a year since an outbreak of hepatitis A spread among homeless residents in San Diego. That provoked the city to make unprecedented moves to clean up.
Lisa Halverstadt checked in on East Village last week and found the tent cities that once dominated blocks in the area have come down. But in some ways, the problem is worse than ever.
On the podcast, we discuss what’s changed and who was left behind.
The People’s Reporter
Developers building in San Diego have a choice: They can set aside 10 percent of the units in their projects for low-income renters, or pay a fee to help build low-income units elsewhere. But not all of the money goes directly to affordable housing, a VOSD analysis found last year. That analysis answers a question recently asked by VOSD reader Michael Castro. He asked:
“Developers who want to build multi-family housing pay a fee to not provide affordable housing. Does that money actually go to build affordable housing?”
Voice’s Lisa Halverstadt and Adriana Heldiz broke it down in this week’s People’s Reporter.
That feature starts at minute 49 in the podcast.
See You Next Week!
Get tickets to our Wednesday live show here.
More Top Stories
China unveiled on Friday retaliatory tariffs against about $75 billion worth of U.S. goods, marking the latest escalation of a protracted trade dispute between the …read more
The Brazilian government lacks the resources to fight a record number of wildfires burning in the Amazon rainforest, President Jair Bolsonaro said on Thursday, weeks …read more
Billionaire industrialist David Koch, a former executive vice president of conglomerate Koch Industries and a major backer of conservative causes and political candidates, has died, …read more
Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday told the Defence Ministry and other government agencies to analyze the threat posed by a new U.S. missile test …read more
The Trump administration is considering a package of tax cuts that could be rolled out before the 2020 U.S. election as a way to buttress …read more
Hong Kong braced on Friday for further demonstrations and a “stress test” of the city’s international airport at the weekend, as nearly three months of …read more